I think one of the most common myths about brand voice is that it's a personality exercise.

This drives me mad!

Pick some adjectives. Include 'warm', 'friendly' and / or 'human'.
And...Done.

As a result, most brand voices are bland, inconsistent and trapped in a PDF.

BUT brand voice sits underneath differentiation, trust and conversion.

Which means it can directly drive revenue.

It's important, people!

Here’s my take:

Brand Voice Is Not A List of Adjectives.

Brand voice is NOT:

✨ β€œBold”

✨ β€œWarm”

✨ β€œInnovative”

✨ β€œAuthentic”

✨ β€œDisruptive”

Nice words. Zero revenue impact.

It’s not just:

🦁 The Hero

🎩 The Magician

🧠 The Sage

☺️ The Caregiver

Archetypes are lenses. They are not a system.

When brand voice lives in a PDF of traits:

πŸ‘‰πŸ» Sales sounds different to marketing

πŸ‘‰πŸ» Your website doesn’t convert

πŸ‘‰πŸ» AI produces beige

πŸ‘‰πŸ» The founder rewrites everything

Brand voice is:

βœ… The language you use

βœ… The language you avoid

βœ… The messages you repeat

βœ… The problems you obsess over

βœ… The beliefs you defend

βœ… And the words your customers already use

Brand voice

sits underneath:

βœ” Differentiation

βœ” Trust

βœ” Conversion

βœ” Investor confidence

When voice is inconsistent or forgettable, everything above it underperforms.

(Forrester found brand consistency can increase revenue by 23%.)

Your brand voice should be:

Systemised.

Repeatable.

Teachable.

Scalable.

Across people.

Across platforms.

Across AI.

Brand voice is not a personality exercise.

It directly links to revenue.

Book a call to talk about how to build a brand voice that brings in revenue.

Previous
Previous

Founder Interview: Daniela Navaes on validating ideas, user research, and building what people will actually pay for

Next
Next

Founder interview: Capucine Codron on RTT, cravings, and the hidden cause of burnout in entrepreneurs (Hint: It’s not workload)